Massachusetts Anti-Casino Ballot Question Gets Nixed by State AG
A citizens’ anti-gambling initiative has been shot down by the State’s Attorney General
While the state of Massachusetts is gearing up for rapid expansion of gambling in the state, not everyone has been excited about the move. That’s why some anti-gambling activists there have created a petition in an effort to force a vote that is statewide set up casino tasks is able to maneuver ahead.
People who are against the brand new casinos were able to gather enough signatures to send the ballot question forward to the attorney general’s office. But unfortuitously for them, the state solicitor but a stop towards the move, saying that the ballot concern would not be legal under the state’s ballot initiative process.
Constitutional Provisions Preclude Ballot Question
Underneath the present state Constitution, the ballot initiative process is covered by Article 48. That article not just describes the process for getting question regarding the ballot, but also establishes exactly what can and may not be included in such concerns. One of the guidelines for proposals says that they cannot restrict an entity’s ‘right to receive compensation for personal property appropriated to public use’.
Based on state solicitor Peter Sacks, in the event that concern were to be authorized by the public, thus ending the casino deals immediately, it would take the casino developers’ contract rights away without any payment. It would also ‘impair the implied contracts’ between the Massachusetts Gaming Commission and those designers, who have already paid millions in application fees to the state. Continue reading “Massachusetts Anti-Casino Ballot Question Gets Nixed by State AG”